In a 2-1 ruling, a 3 judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court ruling that the California state’s ban on “large capacity” magazines violates the 2nd Amendment.
From Chuck Michel (Attorney for CA Rifle & Pistol Assoc.):
In his 66-page ruling, Judge Lee observed, “We understand the purpose in passing this law. But even the laudable goal of reducing gun violence must comply with the Constitution. California’s near-categorical ban of LCMs infringes on the fundamental right to self-defense. It criminalizes the possession of half of all magazines in America today. It makes unlawful magazines that are commonly used in handguns by law-abiding citizens for self-defense. And it substantially burdens the core right of self-defense guaranteed to the people under the Second Amendment. It cannot stand.”
The court applied strict scrutiny to their consideration:
The Ninth Circuit employs a two-prong inquiry to determine whether firearm regulations violate the Second Amendment: (1) whether the law burdens conduct protected by the Second Amendment; and (2) if so, what level of scrutiny to apply to the regulation. United states v. Chovan, 735 F.3d 1127, 1136 (9th Cir. 2013)
The panel held that under the first prong of the test, Cal. Penal Code § 32310 burdened protected conduct. First, the panel held that firearm magazines are protected arms under the Second Amendment. Second, the panel held that LCMs are commonly owned and typically used for lawful purposes, and are not “unusual arms” that would fall outside the scope of the Second Amendment. Third, the panel held that LCM prohibitions are not longstanding regulations and do not enjoy a presumption of lawfulness. Fourth, the panel held that there was no persuasive historical evidence in the record showing LCM possession fell outside the ambit of Second Amendment protection.
Proceeding to prong two of the inquiry, the panel held that strict scrutiny was the appropriate standard to apply. First, the panel held that Cal. Penal Code § 32310 struck at the core right of law-abiding citizens to self-defend by banning LCM possession within the home. Second, the panel held that Section 32310’s near-categorical ban of LCMs substantially burdened core Second Amendment rights. Third, the panel held that decisions in other circuits were distinguishable. Fourth, the panel held that this circuit’s decision in Fyock v. City of Sunnyvale, 779 F.3d 991 (9th Cir. 2015), did not obligate the panel to apply intermediate scrutiny.
The panel held that Cal. Penal Code § 32310 did not survive strict scrutiny review. First, the panel held that the state interests advanced here were compelling: preventing and mitigating gun violence. Second, the panel held that Section 32310 was not narrowly tailored to achieve the compelling state interests it purported to serve because the state’s chosen method – a statewide blanket ban on possession everywhere and for nearly everyone – was not the least restrictive means of achieving the compelling interests.
The panel held that even if intermediate scrutiny were to apply, Cal. Penal Code § 32310 would still fail. The panel held that while the interests expressed by the state qualified as “important,” the means chosen to advance those interests were not substantially related to their service.
TTAG says the fight is not likely over and outlines the next steps they think Becerra will opt for.
6 thoughts on “Ninth Circuit Strikes Down CA High Capacity Magazine Ban”
Thanks so much for the blog post.
Thank you ever so for you article post.
Hi there, after reading this amazing paragraph i am as well delighted to share my knowledge here with friends.
I used to be able to find good info from your blog posts.
Hi there I am so grateful I found your weblog,
I really found you by accident, while I was looking on Yahoo for something else, Regardless I
am here now and would just like to say many thanks for a tremendous post and
a all round entertaining blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to go through it all
at the minute but I have book-marked it and also included your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to
read much more, Please do keep up the excellent
If you wish for to get a good deal from this article then you have
to apply such methods to your won webpage.